Last week, I shared my notes from Day 1 of the I2NY Summit on developing a new information infrastructure for NYS. I didn’t take many notes on Day 2 because I was too busy participating in the thinking and discussing that went on. The outcome oft hese two, intensive days was a list of priorities that will form the basis for the next stage of I2NY development. Those priorities are:
- Develop a framework for statewide negotiations, inclusive of goals, stakeholder involvement, and boundaries for terms (common principles) (17 votes)
- Leaders continue conversation about achieving common goals/objectives. Stakeholders include NY 3Rs (Regional Library UCouncils), State Library, SLSA (School Library System Association), NYSHEI (New York State Higher Education Inititative), NYLA (New York Library Association), CUNY (City University of New York), SUNY (State University of New York), IDS (Information Delivery Service), PULISDO (Public Library System Directors Organization) (16 votes)
- Build a transactional model by which libraries can trade, barter, or sell services and staff time to each other (15 votes)
- NY3Rs take a leadership role in convening library, cultural heritage, economic positions in regions to develop an action plan that will lead to robust library/information delivery systems (15 votes)
- Create a clearinghouse for initiatives & ideas and sharing (13 votes)(public, academic school, etc.). See Cultural Data project model. (11 votes)
- Identify major challenges/opportunities that require federated IDM to solve (10 votes)
- Develop best practices—identify structure, roles, training, process for creating, preserving, discovering and distributing content, including templates for success (9 votes)
- Develop collection practices including last copy, service and delivery policies (e-delivery?), de-duplication (9 votes)
The full set of recommendations in the 18 topical areas addressed are located here -
http://sync.in/7s5Kd9wgP5
. Would love to hear your thoughts and reactions….
Posted by Byrnes, Jennifer on October 4, 2012 at 6:05 pm
I find the barter/trade/sell services or staff concept very interesting. Did they give an example of this? I wonder how it would play out, if some libraries would get territorial, etc.